QuestLab Plataforma Inteligente de Questões
Banco público de questões

Questões para Concursos

Pesquise questões reais por disciplina, assunto, tópico, banca, órgão, cargo, ano e modalidade.

Questões por banca

29 bancas disponíveis. Clique para visualizar todas.

Encontre as questões que procura
Limpar filtros
396 questões encontradas
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question. Stephen R. Covey (2017) once explained the importance of priorities by using an experience he had in a business class. He stated that a professor stood in front of a group of students and set a large canning jar in front of them. He filled it to the top with rocks and asked the students if it was full. They responded yes. Then he took out a bucket of sand and filled the jar again, and students watched as the sand poured inside the spaces between the large rocks. The professor asked again if the jar was full. This time students hesitated, and with good reason. The professor proceeded to fill the jar with a pitcher of water, after which he asked the students to explain the purpose behind this visual demonstration. After several incorrect responses, (including something along the lines of. There is always room for more stuff in your life), the professor gave his answer, which amounts to this: Unless you put the rocks in first, they will never fit into the jar. This story demonstrates the principle of prioritizing, of knowing what matters most and what matters least, and that what matters most must be placed in the first position. No doubt, this is a very relevant way to analyze your own ecosystem 1 . As you move forward in developing a lifestyle that incorporates language learning, you must constantly reflect on whether or not you have prioritized your tasks well. If you imagine your ecosystem as the canning jar, and your language tasks as items that fill up the jar, you can see how making the right decisions will increase your chances of not only enjoying the learning process but making it more successful. Always remember that it is not just “doing a lot of language stuff” that will bring you success but rather that by putting priorities in their place, language learning can happen on its own. Let’s talk about how to prioritize language learning tasks by using the metaphor of the canning jar itself and discuss two concepts: fixed and fluid. (Dixon, Shane. The language learner guidebook: powerful tools to help you conquer any language. [S.l.]: Wayzgoose, 2018. Adaptado) 1 A language ecosystem describes a holistic environment that encourages and extends the learning and application of language beyond the classroom through a diverse system of tasks and incentives.

Based on the canning jar metaphor, which interpretation best aligns with Covey’s intended message?

A Prioritizing essential learning tasks creates space for less critical activities.
B Language learning success comes from multitasking across various smaller activities.
C Language students must learn basic structures to save time.
D Filling the jar with water will ensure subsequent elements will fit in eventually.
E Language tasks should be added at each students’ own pace.
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question. Stephen R. Covey (2017) once explained the importance of priorities by using an experience he had in a business class. He stated that a professor stood in front of a group of students and set a large canning jar in front of them. He filled it to the top with rocks and asked the students if it was full. They responded yes. Then he took out a bucket of sand and filled the jar again, and students watched as the sand poured inside the spaces between the large rocks. The professor asked again if the jar was full. This time students hesitated, and with good reason. The professor proceeded to fill the jar with a pitcher of water, after which he asked the students to explain the purpose behind this visual demonstration. After several incorrect responses, (including something along the lines of. There is always room for more stuff in your life), the professor gave his answer, which amounts to this: Unless you put the rocks in first, they will never fit into the jar. This story demonstrates the principle of prioritizing, of knowing what matters most and what matters least, and that what matters most must be placed in the first position. No doubt, this is a very relevant way to analyze your own ecosystem 1 . As you move forward in developing a lifestyle that incorporates language learning, you must constantly reflect on whether or not you have prioritized your tasks well. If you imagine your ecosystem as the canning jar, and your language tasks as items that fill up the jar, you can see how making the right decisions will increase your chances of not only enjoying the learning process but making it more successful. Always remember that it is not just “doing a lot of language stuff” that will bring you success but rather that by putting priorities in their place, language learning can happen on its own. Let’s talk about how to prioritize language learning tasks by using the metaphor of the canning jar itself and discuss two concepts: fixed and fluid. (Dixon, Shane. The language learner guidebook: powerful tools to help you conquer any language. [S.l.]: Wayzgoose, 2018. Adaptado) 1 A language ecosystem describes a holistic environment that encourages and extends the learning and application of language beyond the classroom through a diverse system of tasks and incentives.

What rhetorical device does the author use to reinforce the significance of prioritization in language learning?

A Irony to criticize common teaching methods.
B Anecdote to contextualize the abstract concept of prioritization.
C Hyperbole to exaggerate the consequences of poor planning.
D Juxtaposition of success and failure in language acquisition.
E Enumeration of ineffective strategies.
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question. Stephen R. Covey (2017) once explained the importance of priorities by using an experience he had in a business class. He stated that a professor stood in front of a group of students and set a large canning jar in front of them. He filled it to the top with rocks and asked the students if it was full. They responded yes. Then he took out a bucket of sand and filled the jar again, and students watched as the sand poured inside the spaces between the large rocks. The professor asked again if the jar was full. This time students hesitated, and with good reason. The professor proceeded to fill the jar with a pitcher of water, after which he asked the students to explain the purpose behind this visual demonstration. After several incorrect responses, (including something along the lines of. There is always room for more stuff in your life), the professor gave his answer, which amounts to this: Unless you put the rocks in first, they will never fit into the jar. This story demonstrates the principle of prioritizing, of knowing what matters most and what matters least, and that what matters most must be placed in the first position. No doubt, this is a very relevant way to analyze your own ecosystem 1 . As you move forward in developing a lifestyle that incorporates language learning, you must constantly reflect on whether or not you have prioritized your tasks well. If you imagine your ecosystem as the canning jar, and your language tasks as items that fill up the jar, you can see how making the right decisions will increase your chances of not only enjoying the learning process but making it more successful. Always remember that it is not just “doing a lot of language stuff” that will bring you success but rather that by putting priorities in their place, language learning can happen on its own. Let’s talk about how to prioritize language learning tasks by using the metaphor of the canning jar itself and discuss two concepts: fixed and fluid. (Dixon, Shane. The language learner guidebook: powerful tools to help you conquer any language. [S.l.]: Wayzgoose, 2018. Adaptado) 1 A language ecosystem describes a holistic environment that encourages and extends the learning and application of language beyond the classroom through a diverse system of tasks and incentives.

Assinale a alternativa que representa uma inferência válida sobre o papel do professor na história apresentada.

A Demonstração de desaprovação por alunos que cometem erros.
B Priorização de testes padronizados como forma de avaliação.
C Uso de uma abordagem construtivista para provocar reflexão nos alunos.
D Favorecimento da aprendizagem baseada em memorização de vocabulário.
E Uso de metodologia tradicional baseada em repetição.
Texto associado
Brown (2006) mentions that language, culture, and context are very influential in effective communication. Read the account by a foreigner of his experience in another country to answer question. At first, things in the cities look pretty much alike. There are taxis, hotels with hot and cold running water, theaters, neon lights, even tall buildings with elevators and a few people who can speak English. But pretty soon the American discovers that underneath the familiar...exterior there are vast differences. When someone says “yes” it often doesn’t mean yes at all, and when people smile it doesn’t always mean they are pleased. When the American visitor makes a helpful gesture, he may be rebuffed, when he tries to be friendly nothing happens. People tell him that they will do things and don’t. The longer he stays, the more enigmatic the new country looks.

This text could be part of a reading unit aimed at developing students’ awareness of

A cultural prejudice.
B linguistic discrimination.
C language misuse and misinterpretation.
D language variation.
E cultural and linguistic diversity.

Read the anecdote. I’m a nurse, one time for Valentine’s Day I brought little satin hearts for my co-workers to pin in them. They were different sizes. There was a Dr there; when I was handing them out, someone decided he should have the largest one. Later a family member comes to the desk asking for the Dr, my coworker says “oh he’s down that way, he’s the one with the big heart on”… (https://www.reddit.com) The misunderstanding by the family member may have happened because

A inadequate use of the preposition “on” probably confused the family member.
B the family member was not aware of the specificity of the context.
C faulty use of the English language by the coworker caused confusion.
D the family member misunderstood a cultural aspect.
E age-related misinterpretation resulted in lack of comprehension.
Texto associado
Leia o texto para responder à questão. Segundo Kramasch (2024), o conceito de competência intercultural recebeu um novo significado por meio do uso de comunicação mediada por computadores (CMC), com o objetivo de promover a interação na L2 entre falantes nativos e não nativos da língua e entre falantes não nativos, e de capacitá-los a ter acesso a e manipular ambientes culturais não nacionais. O acesso direto a falantes da L2 e a imersão cultural promovida pela CMC realçam a ilusão do imediatismo semiótico e a autenticidade cultural. Entretanto, não conduziu, necessariamente, a uma exploração profunda de diferenças culturais. A comunicação intercultural online enfatizou a participação em comunidades online, a colaboração, a solução conjunta de problemas e o desenvolvimento de identidades híbridas que tanto independem das coações sociais do mundo real, quanto ficam sujeitas às pressões sociais e às coações coletivas das comunidades online. Não é à toa que há um número crescente de linguistas aplicados que estão ávidos a trazer a história, a memória e os aspectos subjetivos da aprendizagem de línguas de volta à sala de aula, bem como uma reflexão sobre o significado de operar entre línguas, a partir do background cultural do próprio indivíduo. (Kramasch, C. 2024. Adaptado)

In the text, Kramasch points out that, as far as L2 teaching goes,

A the results achieved with computer-mediated communication have led teachers to advocate the return of learning issues to the classroom.
B the use of computer-mediated communication has distanced users from the real world and prevented them from knowing the culture of the other with whom they interact.
C most users of computer-mediated communication end up joining the same communities they would join if it were not to develop another language.
D the use of technology, though a breakthrough in communication between native and non-native speakers, has not substantially contributed to intercultural competence.
E there are pressures when we use another language, both in the real world and in the technological world, and these can hinder foreign language learning.
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question. Robots are writing more of what we read on the internet. And artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools are becoming freely available for anyone, including students, to use. In a period of rapid change, there are enormous ethical implications for post-human authorship — in which humans and machines collaborate. The study of AI ethics needs to be central to education as we increasingly use machinegenerated content to communicate with others. AI robot writers, such as GPT-3 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) take seconds to create text that seems like it was written by humans. In September, 2020 GPT-3 wrote an entire essay in The Guardian to convince people not to fear artificial intelligence. As recently as 2019, this kind of technology seemed a long way off. But today, it is readily available. Of course, there’s the issue of cheating on essays and other assignments. School and university leaders need to have difficult conversations about what constitutes “authorship” and “editorship” in the post-human age. We are all (already) writing with technological devices, even just via spelling and grammar checkers. (https://theconversation.com. Adaptado)

According to the first and second paragraphs,

A AI produced content is now available to all at no cost.
B robots are becoming the substitutes to internet writers.
C because we use AI produced content, we need information on ethics.
D most of what we read on the internet has been created by AI.
E we consume more and more AI produced content, online or offline.
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question. Robots are writing more of what we read on the internet. And artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools are becoming freely available for anyone, including students, to use. In a period of rapid change, there are enormous ethical implications for post-human authorship — in which humans and machines collaborate. The study of AI ethics needs to be central to education as we increasingly use machinegenerated content to communicate with others. AI robot writers, such as GPT-3 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) take seconds to create text that seems like it was written by humans. In September, 2020 GPT-3 wrote an entire essay in The Guardian to convince people not to fear artificial intelligence. As recently as 2019, this kind of technology seemed a long way off. But today, it is readily available. Of course, there’s the issue of cheating on essays and other assignments. School and university leaders need to have difficult conversations about what constitutes “authorship” and “editorship” in the post-human age. We are all (already) writing with technological devices, even just via spelling and grammar checkers. (https://theconversation.com. Adaptado)

As far as formal teaching and learning are concerned, it is correct to state from the reading of the text:

A AI is a reality in most classrooms, and learning tasks must inevitably incorporate it to help learning in technological times.
B AI has become increasingly relevant for students since it helps produce texts by offering content as well as language information.
C AI must be only gradually introduced in schools, considering it is very recent technology and teachers and students are uncertain about it.
D AI should be used as largely in the classroom as other technologies have for some time now.
E a new parameter for “authorship” or “editorship” must be a topic of discussion among education leaders in the present AI era.
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question. Robots are writing more of what we read on the internet. And artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools are becoming freely available for anyone, including students, to use. In a period of rapid change, there are enormous ethical implications for post-human authorship — in which humans and machines collaborate. The study of AI ethics needs to be central to education as we increasingly use machinegenerated content to communicate with others. AI robot writers, such as GPT-3 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) take seconds to create text that seems like it was written by humans. In September, 2020 GPT-3 wrote an entire essay in The Guardian to convince people not to fear artificial intelligence. As recently as 2019, this kind of technology seemed a long way off. But today, it is readily available. Of course, there’s the issue of cheating on essays and other assignments. School and university leaders need to have difficult conversations about what constitutes “authorship” and “editorship” in the post-human age. We are all (already) writing with technological devices, even just via spelling and grammar checkers. (https://theconversation.com. Adaptado)

As questões levantadas no texto sobre o uso de IA em ambientes educacionais podem mais diretamente trazer preocupações aos professores quando atendendo ao seguinte aspecto discriminado no Currículo Paulista:

A “... foco na compreensão (ou escuta) e na produção oral (ou fala)”.
B “Conhecimentos linguísticos: consolidam-se pelas práticas de uso, análise e reflexão sobre a língua...”.
C “Trata-se, portanto, de uma escrita autoral, que se inicia com textos que utilizam poucos recursos verbais... e se desenvolve para textos mais elaborados”.
D “Quem define o que é o ‘correto’ na língua? Quem estaria incluído nesses usos da linguagem? Quem estaria silenciado?”.
E “Identificar o lugar de si e o do outro em um mundo plurilíngue e multicultural”.
Texto associado
Read the text to answer question. Robots are writing more of what we read on the internet. And artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools are becoming freely available for anyone, including students, to use. In a period of rapid change, there are enormous ethical implications for post-human authorship — in which humans and machines collaborate. The study of AI ethics needs to be central to education as we increasingly use machinegenerated content to communicate with others. AI robot writers, such as GPT-3 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) take seconds to create text that seems like it was written by humans. In September, 2020 GPT-3 wrote an entire essay in The Guardian to convince people not to fear artificial intelligence. As recently as 2019, this kind of technology seemed a long way off. But today, it is readily available. Of course, there’s the issue of cheating on essays and other assignments. School and university leaders need to have difficult conversations about what constitutes “authorship” and “editorship” in the post-human age. We are all (already) writing with technological devices, even just via spelling and grammar checkers. (https://theconversation.com. Adaptado)

In the sentence from the second paragraph “In a period of rapid change, there are enormous ethical implications for post-human authorship — in which humans and machines collaborate ”, the fragment in bold intends to

A argument.
B explain.
C exemplify.
D justify.
E persuade.