QuestLab Plataforma Inteligente de Questões
Banco público de questões

Questões para Concursos

Pesquise questões reais por disciplina, assunto, tópico, banca, órgão, cargo, ano e modalidade.

Questões por banca

29 bancas disponíveis. Clique para visualizar todas.

Encontre as questões que procura
Limpar filtros
52 questões encontradas

“Justiça é consciência, não uma consciência pessoal, mas a consciência de toda a humanidade. Aqueles que reconhecem claramente a voz de suas próprias consciências normalmente reconhecem também a voz da justiça.” (Alexander Solzhenitsyn) A afirmação que está de acordo com a estruturação e a significação desse pensamento é:

A a conjunção “mas” mostra uma oposição entre “consciência” e “consciência de toda a humanidade”;
B ao dizer que justiça é a consciência de toda a humanidade, o autor mostra uma marca da justiça: a imparcialidade;
C o segmento “não uma consciência pessoal” corrige o erro do emprego do termo “consciência” no trecho anterior;
D o segundo período amplia a informação do texto, uma espécie de consequência da afirmação anterior;
E o termo “normalmente” indica que o processo de reconhecimento ocorre de forma particular em cada cidadão.

“Quando se julga por indução e sem o necessário conhecimento dos fatos, às vezes chega-se a ser injusto até mesmo com os malfeitores.” O raciocínio abaixo que deve ser considerado como indutivo é:

A Os funcionários públicos folgam amanhã, por isso meu marido ficará em casa;
B Todos os juízes procuram julgar corretamente, por isso é o que ele também procura;
C Nos dias de semana os mercados abrem, por isso deixarei para comprar isso amanhã;
D No inverno, chove todos os dias, por isso vou comprar um guarda-chuva;
E Ontem nevou bastante, por isso as estradas devem estar intransitáveis.

“Todos aqueles que devem deliberar sobre quaisquer questões devem manter-se imunes ao ódio e à simpatia, à ira e ao sentimentalismo.” Tratando-se de um pensamento dirigido àqueles que julgam, o seu autor recomenda que eles:

A pratiquem a caridade em relação ao próximo;
B deixem de lado, no julgamento, questões pessoais;
C não abandonem o sentimento ao julgarem;
D considerem sempre a realidade do próximo;
E privilegiem sempre a verdade.

“A arte de interrogar não é tão fácil como se pensa. É mais uma arte de mestres do que discípulos; é preciso já ter aprendido muitas coisas para saber perguntar o que não se sabe.” A frase abaixo que mostra uma interrogação, ainda que indireta, é:

A Sei o porquê de ele ter chegado atrasado;
B Vi quando o táxi capotou;
C Desconheço onde ele mora;
D Vi como ela fez isso;
E Queria conhecer todas as respostas.

“Não há nada que demonstre tão bem a grandeza e a potência da inteligência humana, nem a superioridade e a nobreza do homem, como o fato de ele poder conhecer, compreender por completo e sentir fortemente a sua pequenez.” Os termos desse pensamento mostram paralelismo perfeito nos seguintes segmentos:

A “Não há nada” / “como o fato”;
B “que demonstre” / “de ele poder conhecer”;
C “a grandeza e a potência da inteligência humana” / “a superioridade e a nobreza do homem”;
D “poder conhecer” / “compreender por completo”;
E “como o fato de ele poder conhecer” / “compreender por completo e sentir fortemente”.
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals. People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is deeply flawed. A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at different times. Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine. In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by their function , not just their physical form. Some scientists believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains work. Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs, a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated, continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and fight illness.[…] If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check. Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body to provide this necessary ingredient. For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor. Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge. (Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on February 9th, 2022)

The title of the text implies that the author will:

A report an event;
B provide some advice;
C support an argument;
D give a few instructions;
E complain about a proposal.
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals. People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is deeply flawed. A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at different times. Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine. In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by their function , not just their physical form. Some scientists believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains work. Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs, a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated, continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and fight illness.[…] If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check. Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body to provide this necessary ingredient. For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor. Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge. (Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on February 9th, 2022)

Based on the text, mark the statements below as TRUE (T) or FALSE (F).

( ) Unlike a computer, it is hard for our brain to classify objects according to a specific purpose.

( ) The author rules out the possibility that computers may emulate the human brain someday.

( ) The brain adapts as one both matures and becomes more knowledgeable. The statements are, respectively:

A F – T – T;
B T – F – F;
C F – T – F;
D F – F – T;
E T – T – F.
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals. People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is deeply flawed. A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at different times. Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine. In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by their function , not just their physical form. Some scientists believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains work. Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs, a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated, continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and fight illness.[…] If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check. Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body to provide this necessary ingredient. For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor. Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge. (Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on February 9th, 2022)

According to the author, explaining the brain as a computer is:

A inaccurate;
B impartial;
C faultless;
D reliable;
E precise.
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals. People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is deeply flawed. A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at different times. Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine. In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by their function , not just their physical form. Some scientists believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains work. Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs, a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated, continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and fight illness.[…] If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check. Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body to provide this necessary ingredient. For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor. Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge. (Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on February 9th, 2022)

“Whereas” in “A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain constantly rewires itself as you age and learn” introduces a(n):

A cause;
B contrast;
C condition;
D illustration;
E explanation.
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals. People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is deeply flawed. A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at different times. Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine. In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by their function , not just their physical form. Some scientists believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains work. Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs, a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated, continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and fight illness.[…] If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check. Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body to provide this necessary ingredient. For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor. Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge. (Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on February 9th, 2022)

The passage in which the verb phrase indicates a necessity is:

A “this incredible ability of the brain […] may be fundamental”;
B “some engineers can come up with something”;
C “computers don’t work this way”;
D “brains don’t store information”;
E “it must regulate a body”.