QuestLab Plataforma Inteligente de Questões
Banco público de questões

Questões para Concursos

Pesquise questões reais por disciplina, assunto, tópico, banca, órgão, cargo, ano e modalidade.

Questões por banca

29 bancas disponíveis. Clique para visualizar todas.

Encontre as questões que procura
Limpar filtros
83 questões encontradas

Read the text and point out the option that matches content. A Way Back From Campus Chaos Protesting the world’s wrongs has been a rite of passage for generations of American youth, buoyed by our strong laws protecting free speech and free assembly. Yet the students and other demonstrators disrupting college campuses this spring are being taught the wrong lesson – for as admirable as it can be to stand up for your beliefs, there are no guarantees that doing so will be without consequence. The highest calling of a university is to craft a culture of open inquiry, one where both free speech and academic freedom are held as ideals. Protest is part of that culture, and the issue on which so many of the current demonstrations are centered – U.S. involvement in the Israel-Hamas conflict – ought to be fiercely and regularly debated on college campuses. The constitutional right to free speech is the protection against government interference restricting speech. In the real world, though, this can get messy, and nuance is required when free speech comes into tension with protecting academic freedom. The earliest universities to adopt the principle of academic freedom did so to thwart interference and influence from totalitarian states and religious zealotry. Student codes of conduct and other guidelines are meant to relieve some of the tension between free speech and academic freedom, as well as to ensure that schools are in compliance with government regulations and laws. During the current demonstrations, a lack of accountability has helped produce a crisis. It has left some Jewish students feeling systematically harassed. It has deprived many students of access to parts of campus life. For years, right-wing Republicans, at the federal and state level, have found opportunities to crusade against academic freedom, with charges of antisemitism on campus serving as the latest vehicle. The House of Representatives used this moment of chaos as cover to begin a legislative effort to crack down on elite universities, and lawmakers in the House recently passed a proposal that would impose egregious government restrictions on free speech. Schools ought to be teaching their students that there is as much courage in listening as there is in speaking up. It has not gone unnoticed – on campuses but also by members of Congress and by the public writ large – that many of those who are now demanding the right to protest have previously sought to curtail the speech of those whom they declared hateful. Establishing a culture of openness and free expression is crucial to the mission of educational institutions. That includes clear guardrails on conduct and enforcement of those guardrails, regardless of the speaker or the topic. Doing so would not only help restore order on college campuses today but would also strengthen the cultural bedrock of higher education for generations to come. (Available in: https://www.nytimes.com. Acessed: July 2024.)

A Protesters’ behavior has been proven to be contradictory.
B Legislators ought to enforce students’ conduct guidelines.
C By and large the public opinion backed the students’ plea.
D Universities should avert the discussion of political issues.

After carrying out text reading, it is possible to infer the featured words highlight. The announcement of pandemic-related lockdown measures in March 2020 in the UK led to a wide-ranging series of measures in education as a whole to deal with the sudden changes in the learning environment. These included top-down policy directives and centralised toolkits, but arguably in language education the most effective responses were often bottom-up community initiatives. Language education was well placed to deal with some of the challenges in responding to the rapid move to online teaching through historical work in areas such as computer-assisted language learning (CALL) (Levy) dating back to the 1960s and more recent variants such as mobile-assisted language learning (MALL). There has been undeniably community-driven work in the school sector in particular in recent years, with the use of the #MFLTwitterati hashtag in part driving debate around the use of technology in language education on Twitter long before COVID-19 struck, and the TiLT (Technology in Language Teaching) webinar series, which began soon afterwards in March 2020. During the COVID-19 crisis, in a drive to support language teachers in moving to online teaching, experts at the Open University developed a free toolkit that could be downloaded, used, adapted and modified by ML practitioners which indeed made a difference. Social media was often a useful platform to provide help with teaching online (Rosell-Aguilar). Other examples include interdisciplinary discussions, such as the AMLUK Symposium on Modern Languages, Area Studies and Linguistics in 2021, which provided examples of the relationship and possible interdisciplinary links between research and pedagogy in Modern Languages, Area Studies and Linguistics. This symposium assuredly opened up constructive discussions about which teaching methodologies and strategies could support the internationalisation and decolonisation of our discipline. (Reflections on Post-Pandemic Pedagogical Trends in Language Education. In: Dec, 2023.)

A Similarity.
B Disclaimer.
C Endorsement.
D Resemblance.
Texto associado
Something in the water? Why we love shark films From the Steven Spielberg classic Jaws, to predators stalking the Seine in Under Paris, there is no shortage of shark films. Hollywood and audiences love them, seemingly never tiring of the suspense, gore and terror. There are prehistoric giant sharks in The Meg, genetically engineered ones in Deep Blue Sea, and sharks high on cocaine in the ingeniously named Cocaine Shark. Even Donald Trump is a fan – he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president. I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool. It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres. Hayley Easton Street is the British director behind a new shark film, Something in the Water, which tells the story of a group of women stranded at sea. She explains that, as fan of shark films herself, she “absolutely wanted” to make the movie. So why are shark movies so popular? “It's the fear of what could be going on with the unknown of [the sea]” she tells BBC News. “Just being stuck in the middle of the ocean is scary enough. You're trapped in something else's world and anything could happen.” But despite Street's love of shark films, she did not want the ones in hers to be portrayed as marine serial killers. “We kill 100 million sharks every year” she notes. The director was also aware that the release of Jaws led to a huge rise in the hunting of sharks, partly because they had been portrayed as merciless killers. “As much as I love shark films, I love sharks.” “I was really conscious of that, because it's easy for people to start seeing them as killing machines... or monsters, which they are not.” She adds: “I feel it's more scary to have the realistic theme of it, that, you know, if you are out in the ocean and there are sharks and they do mistake you for something else, they will kill you.” Despite the huge success of Jaws, Spielberg has said he “truly regrets the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film”. Spielberg is not the only person concerned about Hollywood's portrayal of sharks and the impact it continues to have. US marine biologist Andriana Fragola dedicates herself to educating people about sharks, often sharing videos of her diving with them. She says they are “misunderstood predators” that have been harmed by movies and the media. Andriana tells me that she has watched Netflix's new shark film, Under Paris, and was not impressed. “Their whole thing was it's about conservation, about studying them, but then the sharks are still eating people.” “So it's giving a little bit more of a rounded education and a little bit more depth to the story, it's not just people swimming at the beach and getting attacked and eaten.” “But the bottom line and what people can draw from the movie is that sharks are still really dangerous to people and they're just going to continuously hunt and eat people.” “If that was true, we would be reduced as a human species. Everyone who goes to the beach, they would be threatened.” Andriana says the perception of sharks causes a real issue for conservation. “It's a huge problem because people don't want to protect something that they're scared of.” “The perception from people is that they're dangerous to humans so we should eradicate them, and that's obviously a huge problem for conservation and getting people to want to empathise or sympathise with sharks and wanting to actually protect them.” “It's unfortunate because 100 million sharks are killed every year, and globally sharks kill fewer than 10 people every year.” “We're really focused on the sharks being the monsters and them being out to get us. In reality it's the opposite.” It is unlikely that Hollywood will stop making shark films, or we will stop watching them. But the figures show that far from being the serial killers of the sea, sharks are actually much more likely to be the victims of humans. (Charlotte Gallagher, Culture reporter, BBC 2024. Accessed: 29 July 2024. Available in: . Adapted.)

According to the text, it’s correct to affirm that Donald Trump:

A Almost played the US President in Sharknado.
B Became the US President after playing the role in Sharknado.
C Dislikes shark movies because of their damage to actual sharks.
D Became friends with Steven Spielberg after playing a role in Jaws.
Texto associado
Something in the water? Why we love shark films From the Steven Spielberg classic Jaws, to predators stalking the Seine in Under Paris, there is no shortage of shark films. Hollywood and audiences love them, seemingly never tiring of the suspense, gore and terror. There are prehistoric giant sharks in The Meg, genetically engineered ones in Deep Blue Sea, and sharks high on cocaine in the ingeniously named Cocaine Shark. Even Donald Trump is a fan – he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president. I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool. It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres. Hayley Easton Street is the British director behind a new shark film, Something in the Water, which tells the story of a group of women stranded at sea. She explains that, as fan of shark films herself, she “absolutely wanted” to make the movie. So why are shark movies so popular? “It's the fear of what could be going on with the unknown of [the sea]” she tells BBC News. “Just being stuck in the middle of the ocean is scary enough. You're trapped in something else's world and anything could happen.” But despite Street's love of shark films, she did not want the ones in hers to be portrayed as marine serial killers. “We kill 100 million sharks every year” she notes. The director was also aware that the release of Jaws led to a huge rise in the hunting of sharks, partly because they had been portrayed as merciless killers. “As much as I love shark films, I love sharks.” “I was really conscious of that, because it's easy for people to start seeing them as killing machines... or monsters, which they are not.” She adds: “I feel it's more scary to have the realistic theme of it, that, you know, if you are out in the ocean and there are sharks and they do mistake you for something else, they will kill you.” Despite the huge success of Jaws, Spielberg has said he “truly regrets the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film”. Spielberg is not the only person concerned about Hollywood's portrayal of sharks and the impact it continues to have. US marine biologist Andriana Fragola dedicates herself to educating people about sharks, often sharing videos of her diving with them. She says they are “misunderstood predators” that have been harmed by movies and the media. Andriana tells me that she has watched Netflix's new shark film, Under Paris, and was not impressed. “Their whole thing was it's about conservation, about studying them, but then the sharks are still eating people.” “So it's giving a little bit more of a rounded education and a little bit more depth to the story, it's not just people swimming at the beach and getting attacked and eaten.” “But the bottom line and what people can draw from the movie is that sharks are still really dangerous to people and they're just going to continuously hunt and eat people.” “If that was true, we would be reduced as a human species. Everyone who goes to the beach, they would be threatened.” Andriana says the perception of sharks causes a real issue for conservation. “It's a huge problem because people don't want to protect something that they're scared of.” “The perception from people is that they're dangerous to humans so we should eradicate them, and that's obviously a huge problem for conservation and getting people to want to empathise or sympathise with sharks and wanting to actually protect them.” “It's unfortunate because 100 million sharks are killed every year, and globally sharks kill fewer than 10 people every year.” “We're really focused on the sharks being the monsters and them being out to get us. In reality it's the opposite.” It is unlikely that Hollywood will stop making shark films, or we will stop watching them. But the figures show that far from being the serial killers of the sea, sharks are actually much more likely to be the victims of humans. (Charlotte Gallagher, Culture reporter, BBC 2024. Accessed: 29 July 2024. Available in: . Adapted.)

Consider the underlined term: “ Even Donald Trump is a fan - he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president. ” (4th§) It’s correct to say that it could be replaced, without change in meaning, by the word:

A Real.
B Current.
C Popular.
D Fictional.
Texto associado
Something in the water? Why we love shark films From the Steven Spielberg classic Jaws, to predators stalking the Seine in Under Paris, there is no shortage of shark films. Hollywood and audiences love them, seemingly never tiring of the suspense, gore and terror. There are prehistoric giant sharks in The Meg, genetically engineered ones in Deep Blue Sea, and sharks high on cocaine in the ingeniously named Cocaine Shark. Even Donald Trump is a fan – he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president. I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool. It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres. Hayley Easton Street is the British director behind a new shark film, Something in the Water, which tells the story of a group of women stranded at sea. She explains that, as fan of shark films herself, she “absolutely wanted” to make the movie. So why are shark movies so popular? “It's the fear of what could be going on with the unknown of [the sea]” she tells BBC News. “Just being stuck in the middle of the ocean is scary enough. You're trapped in something else's world and anything could happen.” But despite Street's love of shark films, she did not want the ones in hers to be portrayed as marine serial killers. “We kill 100 million sharks every year” she notes. The director was also aware that the release of Jaws led to a huge rise in the hunting of sharks, partly because they had been portrayed as merciless killers. “As much as I love shark films, I love sharks.” “I was really conscious of that, because it's easy for people to start seeing them as killing machines... or monsters, which they are not.” She adds: “I feel it's more scary to have the realistic theme of it, that, you know, if you are out in the ocean and there are sharks and they do mistake you for something else, they will kill you.” Despite the huge success of Jaws, Spielberg has said he “truly regrets the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film”. Spielberg is not the only person concerned about Hollywood's portrayal of sharks and the impact it continues to have. US marine biologist Andriana Fragola dedicates herself to educating people about sharks, often sharing videos of her diving with them. She says they are “misunderstood predators” that have been harmed by movies and the media. Andriana tells me that she has watched Netflix's new shark film, Under Paris, and was not impressed. “Their whole thing was it's about conservation, about studying them, but then the sharks are still eating people.” “So it's giving a little bit more of a rounded education and a little bit more depth to the story, it's not just people swimming at the beach and getting attacked and eaten.” “But the bottom line and what people can draw from the movie is that sharks are still really dangerous to people and they're just going to continuously hunt and eat people.” “If that was true, we would be reduced as a human species. Everyone who goes to the beach, they would be threatened.” Andriana says the perception of sharks causes a real issue for conservation. “It's a huge problem because people don't want to protect something that they're scared of.” “The perception from people is that they're dangerous to humans so we should eradicate them, and that's obviously a huge problem for conservation and getting people to want to empathise or sympathise with sharks and wanting to actually protect them.” “It's unfortunate because 100 million sharks are killed every year, and globally sharks kill fewer than 10 people every year.” “We're really focused on the sharks being the monsters and them being out to get us. In reality it's the opposite.” It is unlikely that Hollywood will stop making shark films, or we will stop watching them. But the figures show that far from being the serial killers of the sea, sharks are actually much more likely to be the victims of humans. (Charlotte Gallagher, Culture reporter, BBC 2024. Accessed: 29 July 2024. Available in: . Adapted.)

Consider the sentence " We kill 100 million sharks every year, […]”, said by the British director Hayley Easton Street (12th§) The pronoun “ we ” refers to:

A Divers.
B Humans.
C Marine biologists.
D Shark films’ production teams.
Texto associado
Something in the water? Why we love shark films From the Steven Spielberg classic Jaws, to predators stalking the Seine in Under Paris, there is no shortage of shark films. Hollywood and audiences love them, seemingly never tiring of the suspense, gore and terror. There are prehistoric giant sharks in The Meg, genetically engineered ones in Deep Blue Sea, and sharks high on cocaine in the ingeniously named Cocaine Shark. Even Donald Trump is a fan – he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president. I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool. It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres. Hayley Easton Street is the British director behind a new shark film, Something in the Water, which tells the story of a group of women stranded at sea. She explains that, as fan of shark films herself, she “absolutely wanted” to make the movie. So why are shark movies so popular? “It's the fear of what could be going on with the unknown of [the sea]” she tells BBC News. “Just being stuck in the middle of the ocean is scary enough. You're trapped in something else's world and anything could happen.” But despite Street's love of shark films, she did not want the ones in hers to be portrayed as marine serial killers. “We kill 100 million sharks every year” she notes. The director was also aware that the release of Jaws led to a huge rise in the hunting of sharks, partly because they had been portrayed as merciless killers. “As much as I love shark films, I love sharks.” “I was really conscious of that, because it's easy for people to start seeing them as killing machines... or monsters, which they are not.” She adds: “I feel it's more scary to have the realistic theme of it, that, you know, if you are out in the ocean and there are sharks and they do mistake you for something else, they will kill you.” Despite the huge success of Jaws, Spielberg has said he “truly regrets the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film”. Spielberg is not the only person concerned about Hollywood's portrayal of sharks and the impact it continues to have. US marine biologist Andriana Fragola dedicates herself to educating people about sharks, often sharing videos of her diving with them. She says they are “misunderstood predators” that have been harmed by movies and the media. Andriana tells me that she has watched Netflix's new shark film, Under Paris, and was not impressed. “Their whole thing was it's about conservation, about studying them, but then the sharks are still eating people.” “So it's giving a little bit more of a rounded education and a little bit more depth to the story, it's not just people swimming at the beach and getting attacked and eaten.” “But the bottom line and what people can draw from the movie is that sharks are still really dangerous to people and they're just going to continuously hunt and eat people.” “If that was true, we would be reduced as a human species. Everyone who goes to the beach, they would be threatened.” Andriana says the perception of sharks causes a real issue for conservation. “It's a huge problem because people don't want to protect something that they're scared of.” “The perception from people is that they're dangerous to humans so we should eradicate them, and that's obviously a huge problem for conservation and getting people to want to empathise or sympathise with sharks and wanting to actually protect them.” “It's unfortunate because 100 million sharks are killed every year, and globally sharks kill fewer than 10 people every year.” “We're really focused on the sharks being the monsters and them being out to get us. In reality it's the opposite.” It is unlikely that Hollywood will stop making shark films, or we will stop watching them. But the figures show that far from being the serial killers of the sea, sharks are actually much more likely to be the victims of humans. (Charlotte Gallagher, Culture reporter, BBC 2024. Accessed: 29 July 2024. Available in: . Adapted.)

Consider the underlined term: “ It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres. ” (6th§) It’s correct to imply that these centres are designed for activities related to:

A Working and/or studying.
B Treating people’s injuries.
C Hunting and exploring the woods.
D Doing enjoyable and relaxing things.
Texto associado
Something in the water? Why we love shark films From the Steven Spielberg classic Jaws, to predators stalking the Seine in Under Paris, there is no shortage of shark films. Hollywood and audiences love them, seemingly never tiring of the suspense, gore and terror. There are prehistoric giant sharks in The Meg, genetically engineered ones in Deep Blue Sea, and sharks high on cocaine in the ingeniously named Cocaine Shark. Even Donald Trump is a fan – he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president. I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool. It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres. Hayley Easton Street is the British director behind a new shark film, Something in the Water, which tells the story of a group of women stranded at sea. She explains that, as fan of shark films herself, she “absolutely wanted” to make the movie. So why are shark movies so popular? “It's the fear of what could be going on with the unknown of [the sea]” she tells BBC News. “Just being stuck in the middle of the ocean is scary enough. You're trapped in something else's world and anything could happen.” But despite Street's love of shark films, she did not want the ones in hers to be portrayed as marine serial killers. “We kill 100 million sharks every year” she notes. The director was also aware that the release of Jaws led to a huge rise in the hunting of sharks, partly because they had been portrayed as merciless killers. “As much as I love shark films, I love sharks.” “I was really conscious of that, because it's easy for people to start seeing them as killing machines... or monsters, which they are not.” She adds: “I feel it's more scary to have the realistic theme of it, that, you know, if you are out in the ocean and there are sharks and they do mistake you for something else, they will kill you.” Despite the huge success of Jaws, Spielberg has said he “truly regrets the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film”. Spielberg is not the only person concerned about Hollywood's portrayal of sharks and the impact it continues to have. US marine biologist Andriana Fragola dedicates herself to educating people about sharks, often sharing videos of her diving with them. She says they are “misunderstood predators” that have been harmed by movies and the media. Andriana tells me that she has watched Netflix's new shark film, Under Paris, and was not impressed. “Their whole thing was it's about conservation, about studying them, but then the sharks are still eating people.” “So it's giving a little bit more of a rounded education and a little bit more depth to the story, it's not just people swimming at the beach and getting attacked and eaten.” “But the bottom line and what people can draw from the movie is that sharks are still really dangerous to people and they're just going to continuously hunt and eat people.” “If that was true, we would be reduced as a human species. Everyone who goes to the beach, they would be threatened.” Andriana says the perception of sharks causes a real issue for conservation. “It's a huge problem because people don't want to protect something that they're scared of.” “The perception from people is that they're dangerous to humans so we should eradicate them, and that's obviously a huge problem for conservation and getting people to want to empathise or sympathise with sharks and wanting to actually protect them.” “It's unfortunate because 100 million sharks are killed every year, and globally sharks kill fewer than 10 people every year.” “We're really focused on the sharks being the monsters and them being out to get us. In reality it's the opposite.” It is unlikely that Hollywood will stop making shark films, or we will stop watching them. But the figures show that far from being the serial killers of the sea, sharks are actually much more likely to be the victims of humans. (Charlotte Gallagher, Culture reporter, BBC 2024. Accessed: 29 July 2024. Available in: . Adapted.)

Consider the author’s personal experience with shark movies: “ I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool. ” (5th§) It’s correct to say that the underlined terms could be replaced, without change in meaning, by:

A A hater of.
B Skeptical of.
C Addicted to.
D Indifferent to.
Texto associado
Something in the water? Why we love shark films From the Steven Spielberg classic Jaws, to predators stalking the Seine in Under Paris, there is no shortage of shark films. Hollywood and audiences love them, seemingly never tiring of the suspense, gore and terror. There are prehistoric giant sharks in The Meg, genetically engineered ones in Deep Blue Sea, and sharks high on cocaine in the ingeniously named Cocaine Shark. Even Donald Trump is a fan – he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president. I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool. It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres. Hayley Easton Street is the British director behind a new shark film, Something in the Water, which tells the story of a group of women stranded at sea. She explains that, as fan of shark films herself, she “absolutely wanted” to make the movie. So why are shark movies so popular? “It's the fear of what could be going on with the unknown of [the sea]” she tells BBC News. “Just being stuck in the middle of the ocean is scary enough. You're trapped in something else's world and anything could happen.” But despite Street's love of shark films, she did not want the ones in hers to be portrayed as marine serial killers. “We kill 100 million sharks every year” she notes. The director was also aware that the release of Jaws led to a huge rise in the hunting of sharks, partly because they had been portrayed as merciless killers. “As much as I love shark films, I love sharks.” “I was really conscious of that, because it's easy for people to start seeing them as killing machines... or monsters, which they are not.” She adds: “I feel it's more scary to have the realistic theme of it, that, you know, if you are out in the ocean and there are sharks and they do mistake you for something else, they will kill you.” Despite the huge success of Jaws, Spielberg has said he “truly regrets the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film”. Spielberg is not the only person concerned about Hollywood's portrayal of sharks and the impact it continues to have. US marine biologist Andriana Fragola dedicates herself to educating people about sharks, often sharing videos of her diving with them. She says they are “misunderstood predators” that have been harmed by movies and the media. Andriana tells me that she has watched Netflix's new shark film, Under Paris, and was not impressed. “Their whole thing was it's about conservation, about studying them, but then the sharks are still eating people.” “So it's giving a little bit more of a rounded education and a little bit more depth to the story, it's not just people swimming at the beach and getting attacked and eaten.” “But the bottom line and what people can draw from the movie is that sharks are still really dangerous to people and they're just going to continuously hunt and eat people.” “If that was true, we would be reduced as a human species. Everyone who goes to the beach, they would be threatened.” Andriana says the perception of sharks causes a real issue for conservation. “It's a huge problem because people don't want to protect something that they're scared of.” “The perception from people is that they're dangerous to humans so we should eradicate them, and that's obviously a huge problem for conservation and getting people to want to empathise or sympathise with sharks and wanting to actually protect them.” “It's unfortunate because 100 million sharks are killed every year, and globally sharks kill fewer than 10 people every year.” “We're really focused on the sharks being the monsters and them being out to get us. In reality it's the opposite.” It is unlikely that Hollywood will stop making shark films, or we will stop watching them. But the figures show that far from being the serial killers of the sea, sharks are actually much more likely to be the victims of humans. (Charlotte Gallagher, Culture reporter, BBC 2024. Accessed: 29 July 2024. Available in: . Adapted.)

It’s a known fact that the suffix “ -less ” means “ without ”. So, it’s correct to say that the word “ merciless ” (13th§) means “ without mercy ”. In this context, the word “ mercy ” is a synonym for:

A Pity.
B Knife.
C Charisma.
D Redemption.
Texto associado
Something in the water? Why we love shark films From the Steven Spielberg classic Jaws, to predators stalking the Seine in Under Paris, there is no shortage of shark films. Hollywood and audiences love them, seemingly never tiring of the suspense, gore and terror. There are prehistoric giant sharks in The Meg, genetically engineered ones in Deep Blue Sea, and sharks high on cocaine in the ingeniously named Cocaine Shark. Even Donald Trump is a fan – he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president. I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool. It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres. Hayley Easton Street is the British director behind a new shark film, Something in the Water, which tells the story of a group of women stranded at sea. She explains that, as fan of shark films herself, she “absolutely wanted” to make the movie. So why are shark movies so popular? “It's the fear of what could be going on with the unknown of [the sea]” she tells BBC News. “Just being stuck in the middle of the ocean is scary enough. You're trapped in something else's world and anything could happen.” But despite Street's love of shark films, she did not want the ones in hers to be portrayed as marine serial killers. “We kill 100 million sharks every year” she notes. The director was also aware that the release of Jaws led to a huge rise in the hunting of sharks, partly because they had been portrayed as merciless killers. “As much as I love shark films, I love sharks.” “I was really conscious of that, because it's easy for people to start seeing them as killing machines... or monsters, which they are not.” She adds: “I feel it's more scary to have the realistic theme of it, that, you know, if you are out in the ocean and there are sharks and they do mistake you for something else, they will kill you.” Despite the huge success of Jaws, Spielberg has said he “truly regrets the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film”. Spielberg is not the only person concerned about Hollywood's portrayal of sharks and the impact it continues to have. US marine biologist Andriana Fragola dedicates herself to educating people about sharks, often sharing videos of her diving with them. She says they are “misunderstood predators” that have been harmed by movies and the media. Andriana tells me that she has watched Netflix's new shark film, Under Paris, and was not impressed. “Their whole thing was it's about conservation, about studying them, but then the sharks are still eating people.” “So it's giving a little bit more of a rounded education and a little bit more depth to the story, it's not just people swimming at the beach and getting attacked and eaten.” “But the bottom line and what people can draw from the movie is that sharks are still really dangerous to people and they're just going to continuously hunt and eat people.” “If that was true, we would be reduced as a human species. Everyone who goes to the beach, they would be threatened.” Andriana says the perception of sharks causes a real issue for conservation. “It's a huge problem because people don't want to protect something that they're scared of.” “The perception from people is that they're dangerous to humans so we should eradicate them, and that's obviously a huge problem for conservation and getting people to want to empathise or sympathise with sharks and wanting to actually protect them.” “It's unfortunate because 100 million sharks are killed every year, and globally sharks kill fewer than 10 people every year.” “We're really focused on the sharks being the monsters and them being out to get us. In reality it's the opposite.” It is unlikely that Hollywood will stop making shark films, or we will stop watching them. But the figures show that far from being the serial killers of the sea, sharks are actually much more likely to be the victims of humans. (Charlotte Gallagher, Culture reporter, BBC 2024. Accessed: 29 July 2024. Available in: . Adapted.)

Consider the underlined term “ But despite Street's love of shark films, she did not want the ones in hers to be portrayed as marine serial killers. ” (11th§) The terms presented in the following alternatives could replace it in the sentence, without change of meaning, EXCEPT for:

A Even with.
B In spite of.
C Regardless of.
D In addition to.
Texto associado
Something in the water? Why we love shark films From the Steven Spielberg classic Jaws, to predators stalking the Seine in Under Paris, there is no shortage of shark films. Hollywood and audiences love them, seemingly never tiring of the suspense, gore and terror. There are prehistoric giant sharks in The Meg, genetically engineered ones in Deep Blue Sea, and sharks high on cocaine in the ingeniously named Cocaine Shark. Even Donald Trump is a fan – he was reportedly due to play the US president in a Sharknado film, before becoming the actual president. I became hooked on them after watching James Bond film Thunderball, where the villain keeps sharks in his swimming pool. It led to a lifelong interest in shark films, as well as an irrational fear of swimming pools, even ones filled with chlorine inside leisure centres. Hayley Easton Street is the British director behind a new shark film, Something in the Water, which tells the story of a group of women stranded at sea. She explains that, as fan of shark films herself, she “absolutely wanted” to make the movie. So why are shark movies so popular? “It's the fear of what could be going on with the unknown of [the sea]” she tells BBC News. “Just being stuck in the middle of the ocean is scary enough. You're trapped in something else's world and anything could happen.” But despite Street's love of shark films, she did not want the ones in hers to be portrayed as marine serial killers. “We kill 100 million sharks every year” she notes. The director was also aware that the release of Jaws led to a huge rise in the hunting of sharks, partly because they had been portrayed as merciless killers. “As much as I love shark films, I love sharks.” “I was really conscious of that, because it's easy for people to start seeing them as killing machines... or monsters, which they are not.” She adds: “I feel it's more scary to have the realistic theme of it, that, you know, if you are out in the ocean and there are sharks and they do mistake you for something else, they will kill you.” Despite the huge success of Jaws, Spielberg has said he “truly regrets the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film”. Spielberg is not the only person concerned about Hollywood's portrayal of sharks and the impact it continues to have. US marine biologist Andriana Fragola dedicates herself to educating people about sharks, often sharing videos of her diving with them. She says they are “misunderstood predators” that have been harmed by movies and the media. Andriana tells me that she has watched Netflix's new shark film, Under Paris, and was not impressed. “Their whole thing was it's about conservation, about studying them, but then the sharks are still eating people.” “So it's giving a little bit more of a rounded education and a little bit more depth to the story, it's not just people swimming at the beach and getting attacked and eaten.” “But the bottom line and what people can draw from the movie is that sharks are still really dangerous to people and they're just going to continuously hunt and eat people.” “If that was true, we would be reduced as a human species. Everyone who goes to the beach, they would be threatened.” Andriana says the perception of sharks causes a real issue for conservation. “It's a huge problem because people don't want to protect something that they're scared of.” “The perception from people is that they're dangerous to humans so we should eradicate them, and that's obviously a huge problem for conservation and getting people to want to empathise or sympathise with sharks and wanting to actually protect them.” “It's unfortunate because 100 million sharks are killed every year, and globally sharks kill fewer than 10 people every year.” “We're really focused on the sharks being the monsters and them being out to get us. In reality it's the opposite.” It is unlikely that Hollywood will stop making shark films, or we will stop watching them. But the figures show that far from being the serial killers of the sea, sharks are actually much more likely to be the victims of humans. (Charlotte Gallagher, Culture reporter, BBC 2024. Accessed: 29 July 2024. Available in: . Adapted.)

Consider the following sentences and check if they are true or false, according to the text. Write T for true and F for false and then choose the correct answer.

( ) Andriana Frangola is concerned about Hollywood’s portrayal of sharks, but Steven Spielberg is not.

( ) People will stop making and watching shark movies because of their bad influence in nature.

( ) It’s more likely for a shark to be atacked by a human than the opposite. The answer is correct in

A T, T, F.
B F, F, F.
C T, T, T.
D F, F, T.