As escolas deveriam ensinar os alunos a falhar
Até os erros têm sua função: ensinar às crianças
como lidar com desafios e dificuldades.
Será que só tirar notas dez na escola é garantia de sucesso na vida adulta?
Você sabe como funciona a escola: tire notas boas e todos os professores vão gostar de você, te elogiar e exclamar o tempo todo que você tem um futuro brilhante. Agora, tire notas ruins ou ande um pouco fora da linha. Automaticamente, você vira o baderneiro da turma, o desatento que nunca será ninguém na vida.
Será mesmo?
Tony Little, especialista em educação e ex-diretor de uma das escolas particulares mais famosas do Reino Unido (a Eton, que já formou 19 primeiros-ministros e membros da família real), pensa justamente o contrário. Segundo ele, alunos precisam passar por experiências de falha na escola, para que tenham mais chances de se reerguer em situações mais delicadas na vida adulta. “Não é só ter a experiência de falhar, mas de poder fazê-lo em um ambiente seguro, para que a experiência possa ensinar algo”, disse o ex-diretor no Fórum Global de Educação e Habilidades, em Dubai.
Ou seja, ser sempre popular, só tirar notas boas e nunca sofrer na escola não ajuda ninguém a crescer de verdade. Sem ter de lidar com derrotas, eles não desenvolvem a habilidade para enfrentar dificuldades. “Eles nunca tiveram nada significante para combater”, disse Little.
A declaração de Little, na verdade, já foi cientificamente comprovada. Em 2014, um estudo americano concluiu que determinação e força de vontade, em momentos de dificuldade, ajudam a encarar desafios.
Outro experimento, dessa vez de pesquisadores de Singapura, dividiu 75 adolescentes: o primeiro grupo teve aulas normais com a fala de um professor e terminava com exercícios; já o segundo precisou resolver, em grupos pequenos e sem muita ajuda do professor, problemas bem mais complexos. O segundo grupo, depois de muitos erros, recebia orientação de um professor e, surpresa: tiveram resultados muito melhores do que a outra turma.
O estudo concluiu que, ao falhar, os alunos ativam uma parte do cérebro que possibilita um aprendizado mais profundo. É que eles precisam organizar e analisar mentalmente três coisas: o que já sabem, as limitações daquele conhecimento e, principalmente, o que não sabem. Ou seja: errar, além de ser humano, é muito mais eficaz no processo de aprendizagem.
POR Helô D’Angelo ATUALIZADO EM 17/03/2016 Fonte: http://super.abril.com.br/cotidiano/as-escolas-deveriam-ensinar-os-alunos-a-falhar-1
Banco público de questões
Questões para Concursos
Pesquise questões reais por disciplina, assunto, tópico, banca, órgão, cargo, ano e modalidade.
Questões por banca
29 bancas disponíveis.
Clique para visualizar todas.
Questões por banca
29 bancas disponíveis. Clique para visualizar todas.
Acesse diretamente as bancas disponíveis na QuestLab. As quantidades abaixo consideram as questões ativas do banco.
CEBRASPE
51.840 questões
FGV
25.316 questões
FCC
24.632 questões
AOCP
23.496 questões
IBFC
11.190 questões
VUNESP
11.173 questões
Instituto Quadrix
10.156 questões
FUNDATEC
9.088 questões
IBADE
7.820 questões
CESGRANRIO
6.013 questões
CONSULPLAN
4.174 questões
FEPESE
3.585 questões
IADES
3.439 questões
IESES
2.627 questões
OBJETIVA
2.462 questões
SELECON
2.377 questões
IDECAN
1.907 questões
MS CONCURSOS
1.485 questões
Instituto Legalle
1.281 questões
FAFIPA
1.161 questões
FUMARC
842 questões
ACAFE
551 questões
INSTITUTO AOCP
430 questões
NUCEPE
378 questões
FUNIVERSA
348 questões
FAURGS
203 questões
FIOCRUZ
48 questões
MACKENZIE
48 questões
CETRO
17 questões
12.751 questões encontradas
O preço do cilindro de oxigênio de 3 litros em
Uma amostra de solo possui volumes de ar, água e parte sólida. Diante disso, calcule o Grau de Aeração de uma determinada amostra, sabendo que o volume de ar é igual a 0,003 m³ e o volume de água é igual a 0,005 m³, em porcentagem.
A vasectomia é uma cirurgia simples que resulta na esterilização permanente do homem por impedir a liberação de espermatozoides no líquido ejaculado. Qual estrutura do aparelho reprodutor masculino é rompida cirurgicamente por esse método?
Em se tratando da receita pública, assinale a alternativa correta.
Texto associado
Assinale a alternativa em que a expressão destacada tem função de pronome relativo.
Sobre a chamada “nova questão social” e suas implicações na contemporaneidade, assinale a alternativa INCORRETA.
Na linguagem SQL, as cláusulas SELECT... FROM, bem como instruções INSERT, UPDATE e DELETE, fazem parte de um subconjunto da linguagem denominado
Segundo a portaria nº 2.914/2011 do Ministério da Saúde, compete à CASAN assegurar que a água fornecida contenha um teor mínimo de cloro residual livre de 0,5 mg/L. Se você estiver operando uma estação de tratamento de água que libera 2 mil litros de água por segundo, qual valor mínimo de cloro deverá ser adicionado a cada segundo?
Texto associado
TEXT II – QUESTIONS 33 to 44
Dear Mayor Estrosi, Mayor Vivoni, Prime Minister
Manuel Valls, Former President Nicolas Sarkozy,
and other French officials who have supported
France’s burkini ban:
My name is Amara Majeed, and I am a 19-yearold Muslim Sri Lankan American. I am a student at Brown University, studying cognitive neuroscience and public policy.
When I look at the photo circulating of a woman in Nice being surrounded by armed police officers as she is coerced into removing her clothing, because French officials deemed the burkini to be inappropriate beach attire, I see infringement on a woman’s right to choose what she puts on her body by a group of white males. I see the scapegoating, ostracization, and criminalization of Muslims in the aftermath of the Nice terror attacks. I am a woman who wears the hijab, and I see an affront to the rights and civil liberties of women like me.
Deputy Mayor of Nice, Christian Estrosi: You have stated that you support this ban on “inappropriate clothing” in the wake of the Nice terror attacks. Mayor Vivoni, you have described the burkini ban as a necessary measure to “protect the population.” Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy, you have labeled the burkini as a symbol of extremism.
Let me respond to all of you by saying this: any conflation of the burkini with terrorism is invalid, virulent, and discriminatory. Tell me, in what way does our way of dress pose a threat to France’s national security? In what way does the burkini propagate hateful, violent ideologies? How is it that our way of dress poses a national security threat, yet some wetsuits, which take on strikingly similar designs to the burkini, aren’t? While France’s highest administrative court has now overturned the ban, the damage has already been done — this attack on the Muslim way of dress only serves as fodder to the already existing rising anti-Muslim sentiment and stigmatization of Muslims in France. If this institutionalized Islamophobia and fearmongering is being perpetrated by French officials and authorities, I fear how the general public’s poor treatment of hijab-clad women may be exacerbated in the coming weeks. We’re all well aware that hate crimes and violence targeting Muslim women wearing the hijab is not a new phenomenon in France.
As one burkini-clad woman who was forced to leave the beach states, “Because people who have nothing to do with my religion have killed, I no longer have the right to go to the beach.” In the eyes of many authority figures, our religious identity in and of itself is incriminating. Our way of dress is incriminating. Our sheer existence is incriminating.
Many of you have called the hijab an emblem of oppression. In April, France’s Minister for Women’s Rights equated women who choose to wear the hijab with “Negroes who were in favor of slavery.” More recently, France’s prime minister stated that the burkini is a tool of “enslavement,” and former French President Sarkozy insinuated that hijabclad women are imprisoned.
I am genuinely tired of individuals like you imposing your brand of colonial feminism on us and telling us that we are oppressed, that we have been indoctrinated, that this was not our choice, and that we need to be unshackled. Instead of continuing to pursue these offensive and failing attempts at liberating us, I implore you to liberate yourselves from this white savior complex and recognize that we don’t need your saving. The hijab does not oppress me. For me, the hijab is a symbol of feminism and freedom of expression — so who are you to invalidate my experiences, to invalidate a fundamental, inextricable aspect of my identity, and to label me as enslaved, as imprisoned, as oppressed? By depriving us of our rights to dress the way we want, by making public spaces inaccessible to us, by publicly humiliating us and coercing us to remove some of our clothing while we are trying to enjoy a day at the beach — you are oppressing us.
My news feed has been saturated with people posting photos of a Muslim woman at a beach being forced to strip, captioned with outrage and vitriol towards this form of discrimination. While your support of our rights is appreciated, I ask that you refrain from doing a disservice to this individual by circulating this photo. It may not seem like you are violating a woman’s privacy and liberties by sharing a picture revealing her arms or shoulders, but it is incumbent upon us to understand that she did not freely choose to show those parts of her body in public. Even if the intent is to excoriate the burkini ban while circulating these photos, I implore you to not be complicit, whether directly or indirectly, in systems of oppression that are stripping women, literally, of their right to choose what they wear.
Yours truly,
Amara Majeed – a muslin woman
(Source: http://www.bustle.com/articles/180721-an-open-letter-tofrench-officials-who-support-the-burkini-ban-from-a-muslim-woman)
Dear Mayor Estrosi, Mayor Vivoni, Prime Minister
Manuel Valls, Former President Nicolas Sarkozy,
and other French officials who have supported
France’s burkini ban:
My name is Amara Majeed, and I am a 19-yearold Muslim Sri Lankan American. I am a student at Brown University, studying cognitive neuroscience and public policy.
When I look at the photo circulating of a woman in Nice being surrounded by armed police officers as she is coerced into removing her clothing, because French officials deemed the burkini to be inappropriate beach attire, I see infringement on a woman’s right to choose what she puts on her body by a group of white males. I see the scapegoating, ostracization, and criminalization of Muslims in the aftermath of the Nice terror attacks. I am a woman who wears the hijab, and I see an affront to the rights and civil liberties of women like me.
Deputy Mayor of Nice, Christian Estrosi: You have stated that you support this ban on “inappropriate clothing” in the wake of the Nice terror attacks. Mayor Vivoni, you have described the burkini ban as a necessary measure to “protect the population.” Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy, you have labeled the burkini as a symbol of extremism.
Let me respond to all of you by saying this: any conflation of the burkini with terrorism is invalid, virulent, and discriminatory. Tell me, in what way does our way of dress pose a threat to France’s national security? In what way does the burkini propagate hateful, violent ideologies? How is it that our way of dress poses a national security threat, yet some wetsuits, which take on strikingly similar designs to the burkini, aren’t? While France’s highest administrative court has now overturned the ban, the damage has already been done — this attack on the Muslim way of dress only serves as fodder to the already existing rising anti-Muslim sentiment and stigmatization of Muslims in France. If this institutionalized Islamophobia and fearmongering is being perpetrated by French officials and authorities, I fear how the general public’s poor treatment of hijab-clad women may be exacerbated in the coming weeks. We’re all well aware that hate crimes and violence targeting Muslim women wearing the hijab is not a new phenomenon in France.
As one burkini-clad woman who was forced to leave the beach states, “Because people who have nothing to do with my religion have killed, I no longer have the right to go to the beach.” In the eyes of many authority figures, our religious identity in and of itself is incriminating. Our way of dress is incriminating. Our sheer existence is incriminating.
Many of you have called the hijab an emblem of oppression. In April, France’s Minister for Women’s Rights equated women who choose to wear the hijab with “Negroes who were in favor of slavery.” More recently, France’s prime minister stated that the burkini is a tool of “enslavement,” and former French President Sarkozy insinuated that hijabclad women are imprisoned.
I am genuinely tired of individuals like you imposing your brand of colonial feminism on us and telling us that we are oppressed, that we have been indoctrinated, that this was not our choice, and that we need to be unshackled. Instead of continuing to pursue these offensive and failing attempts at liberating us, I implore you to liberate yourselves from this white savior complex and recognize that we don’t need your saving. The hijab does not oppress me. For me, the hijab is a symbol of feminism and freedom of expression — so who are you to invalidate my experiences, to invalidate a fundamental, inextricable aspect of my identity, and to label me as enslaved, as imprisoned, as oppressed? By depriving us of our rights to dress the way we want, by making public spaces inaccessible to us, by publicly humiliating us and coercing us to remove some of our clothing while we are trying to enjoy a day at the beach — you are oppressing us.
My news feed has been saturated with people posting photos of a Muslim woman at a beach being forced to strip, captioned with outrage and vitriol towards this form of discrimination. While your support of our rights is appreciated, I ask that you refrain from doing a disservice to this individual by circulating this photo. It may not seem like you are violating a woman’s privacy and liberties by sharing a picture revealing her arms or shoulders, but it is incumbent upon us to understand that she did not freely choose to show those parts of her body in public. Even if the intent is to excoriate the burkini ban while circulating these photos, I implore you to not be complicit, whether directly or indirectly, in systems of oppression that are stripping women, literally, of their right to choose what they wear.
Yours truly,
Amara Majeed – a muslin woman
(Source: http://www.bustle.com/articles/180721-an-open-letter-tofrench-officials-who-support-the-burkini-ban-from-a-muslim-woman)