QuestLab Plataforma Inteligente de Questões
Banco público de questões

Questões para Concursos

Pesquise questões reais por disciplina, assunto, tópico, banca, órgão, cargo, ano e modalidade.

Questões por banca

30 bancas disponíveis. Clique para visualizar todas.

Encontre as questões que procura
Limpar filtros
10.449 questões encontradas

“A arte de interrogar não é tão fácil como se pensa. É mais uma arte de mestres do que discípulos; é preciso já ter aprendido muitas coisas para saber perguntar o que não se sabe.” A frase abaixo que mostra uma interrogação, ainda que indireta, é:

A Sei o porquê de ele ter chegado atrasado;
B Vi quando o táxi capotou;
C Desconheço onde ele mora;
D Vi como ela fez isso;
E Queria conhecer todas as respostas.

“Não há nada que demonstre tão bem a grandeza e a potência da inteligência humana, nem a superioridade e a nobreza do homem, como o fato de ele poder conhecer, compreender por completo e sentir fortemente a sua pequenez.” Os termos desse pensamento mostram paralelismo perfeito nos seguintes segmentos:

A “Não há nada” / “como o fato”;
B “que demonstre” / “de ele poder conhecer”;
C “a grandeza e a potência da inteligência humana” / “a superioridade e a nobreza do homem”;
D “poder conhecer” / “compreender por completo”;
E “como o fato de ele poder conhecer” / “compreender por completo e sentir fortemente”.
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals. People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is deeply flawed. A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at different times. Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine. In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by their function , not just their physical form. Some scientists believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains work. Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs, a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated, continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and fight illness.[…] If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check. Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body to provide this necessary ingredient. For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor. Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge. (Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on February 9th, 2022)

The title of the text implies that the author will:

A report an event;
B provide some advice;
C support an argument;
D give a few instructions;
E complain about a proposal.
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals. People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is deeply flawed. A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at different times. Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine. In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by their function , not just their physical form. Some scientists believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains work. Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs, a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated, continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and fight illness.[…] If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check. Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body to provide this necessary ingredient. For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor. Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge. (Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on February 9th, 2022)

Based on the text, mark the statements below as TRUE (T) or FALSE (F).

( ) Unlike a computer, it is hard for our brain to classify objects according to a specific purpose.

( ) The author rules out the possibility that computers may emulate the human brain someday.

( ) The brain adapts as one both matures and becomes more knowledgeable. The statements are, respectively:

A F – T – T;
B T – F – F;
C F – T – F;
D F – F – T;
E T – T – F.
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals. People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is deeply flawed. A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at different times. Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine. In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by their function , not just their physical form. Some scientists believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains work. Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs, a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated, continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and fight illness.[…] If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check. Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body to provide this necessary ingredient. For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor. Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge. (Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on February 9th, 2022)

According to the author, explaining the brain as a computer is:

A inaccurate;
B impartial;
C faultless;
D reliable;
E precise.
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals. People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is deeply flawed. A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at different times. Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine. In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by their function , not just their physical form. Some scientists believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains work. Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs, a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated, continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and fight illness.[…] If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check. Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body to provide this necessary ingredient. For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor. Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge. (Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on February 9th, 2022)

“Whereas” in “A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain constantly rewires itself as you age and learn” introduces a(n):

A cause;
B contrast;
C condition;
D illustration;
E explanation.
Texto associado
Here’s why we’ll never be able to build a brain in a computer It’s easy to equate brains and computers – they’re both thinking machines, after all. But the comparison doesn’t really stand up to closer inspection, as Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett reveals. People often describe the brain as a computer, as if neurons are like hardware and the mind is software. But this metaphor is deeply flawed. A computer is built from static parts, whereas your brain constantly rewires itself as you age and learn. A computer stores information in files that are retrieved exactly, but brains don’t store information in any literal sense. Your memory is a constant construction of electrical pulses and swirling chemicals, and the same remembrance can be reassembled in different ways at different times. Brains also do something critical that computers today can’t. A computer can be trained with thousands of photographs to recognise a dandelion as a plant with green leaves and yellow petals. You, however, can look at a dandelion and understand that in different situations it belongs to different categories. A dandelion in your vegetable garden is a weed, but in a bouquet from your child it’s a delightful flower. A dandelion in a salad is food, but people also consume dandelions as herbal medicine. In other words, your brain effortlessly categorises objects by their function , not just their physical form. Some scientists believe that this incredible ability of the brain, called ad hoc category construction, may be fundamental to the way brains work. Also, unlike a computer, your brain isn’t a bunch of parts in an empty case. Your brain inhabits a body, a complex web of systems that include over 600 muscles in motion, internal organs, a heart that pumps 7,500 litres of blood per day, and dozens of hormones and other chemicals, all of which must be coordinated, continually, to digest food, excrete waste, provide energy and fight illness.[…] If we want a computer that thinks, feels, sees or acts like us, it must regulate a body – or something like a body – with a complex collection of systems that it must keep in balance to continue operating, and with sensations to keep that regulation in check. Today’s computers don’t work this way, but perhaps some engineers can come up with something that’s enough like a body to provide this necessary ingredient. For now, ‘brain as computer’ remains just a metaphor. Metaphors can be wonderful for explaining complex topics in simple terms, but they fail when people treat the metaphor as an explanation. Metaphors provide the illusion of knowledge. (Adapted from https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/canwe-build-brain-computer/ Published: 24th October, 2021, retrieved on February 9th, 2022)

The passage in which the verb phrase indicates a necessity is:

A “this incredible ability of the brain […] may be fundamental”;
B “some engineers can come up with something”;
C “computers don’t work this way”;
D “brains don’t store information”;
E “it must regulate a body”.

O prefeito do Município Alfa decidiu promover uma ampla reestruturação da Administração pública indireta. Para tanto, decidiu que fosse elaborado um estudo preliminar, de modo a delinear os contornos gerais de:

( 1 ) duas entidades com personalidade jurídica própria, para a execução dos serviços públicos de limpeza urbana e de administração de cemitérios públicos; e

( 2 ) de órgãos específicos, a serem criados no âmbito da Secretaria de Saúde e da Secretaria de Ordem Pública, de modo a aumentar a especialização e, consequentemente, o nível de eficiência estatal. É correto afirmar que:

A em (1) são mencionados exemplos de descentralização administrativa por especificação e em (2) de descentralização administrativa por serviços;
B em (1) são mencionados exemplos de desconcentração administrativa por especificação e em (2) de desconcentração administrativa por serviços;
C em (1) são mencionados exemplos de descentralização administrativa por serviços e em (2) de desconcentração administrativa;
D em (1) são mencionados exemplos de desestatização por serviços e em (2) de descentralização administrativa por eficiência;
E em (1) são mencionados exemplos de desestatização por serviços e em (2) de estatização por padrão de eficiência.

Maria, servidora pública federal, foi aposentada por incapacidade permanente. Após algum tempo, junta médica oficial declarou insubsistentes os motivos da aposentadoria. Como Maria estava plenamente apta ao exercício das funções que sempre desempenhou, deve ocorrer o(a) seu/sua:

A aproveitamento;
B reintegração;
C readaptação;
D recondução;
E reversão.

Joana, jovem e renomada escritora de livros infantis, faleceu. O mais velho dos seus herdeiros, com 18 anos de idade, preocupado com a situação dos livros, que geravam uma elevada renda para Joana, questionou um advogado a respeito da proteção constitucional oferecida a direitos dessa natureza. O advogado respondeu, corretamente, que o direito de utilização, publicação ou reprodução das obras de Joana pertence:

A de modo exclusivo e em caráter perpétuo, aos herdeiros;
B de modo exclusivo e pelo tempo que a lei fixar, aos herdeiros;
C ao poder público, não aos herdeiros, que têm assegurado o direito de participação nos lucros obtidos;
D ao público em geral, não aos herdeiros, que têm assegurado o direito de participação nos lucros obtidos;
E aos herdeiros, ao poder público e ao público em geral, assegurando-se aos primeiros o direito de participação nos lucros.