Questões de Inglês da FGV
Pratique questões de Inglês da FGV e filtre por assunto, tópico, órgão, cargo e ano.
Estude com questões da FGV
Consulte o banco público da QuestLab com questões da FGV. Use os filtros abaixo para localizar questões por disciplina, assunto, órgão, cargo, ano e modalidade.
Questões da FGV por disciplina
260 disciplinas disponíveis.
Clique para visualizar todas.
Questões da FGV por disciplina
260 disciplinas disponíveis. Clique para visualizar todas.
Acesse diretamente as disciplinas disponíveis nesta banca. As quantidades abaixo consideram as questões ativas do banco QuestLab.
Ver todas da FGVLeia o texto. Usage and use The distinction between language use and language usage was first made by Widdowson. He coined the term usage for language which conformed to pre-established paradigms of language. Usage is independent of context, and is related to language correctness. In contrast, use has to do with the speaker’s intention in producing a particular sentence. For example, the sentence “I don’t know what you mean”, said in a particular context, may imply a request for clarification; the same sentence, said in a different way and in a different context, may be an expression of disbelief. Most sentences in textbooks and in grammar practices are well-formed sentences. However, can you think of a real-life situation in which a sentence such as “This is my hand” is pronounced? LEWIS, Michael. The lexical approach . Heinle Cengage, 2010. Adaptado. Em muitos contextos da escola brasileira permanece forte a herança da tradição estruturalista, focada em usage. Pense em um professor brasileiro formado dentro de tal tradição que, percebendo seus limites para desenvolver a capacidade de o estudante interagir no mundo por meio da língua inglesa, começa a preparar suas aulas sob a ótica de uma abordagem centrada em use . Esse professor, ao final de uma atividade em classe, perguntar-se-ia em primeiro lugar se, em sua aula,
Read the following exchange: A: Why was the king only able to draw straight lines? B: Because he is a ruler. Humor is caused by a linguistic property named
Texto associado
O conectivo em negrito no trecho retirado do texto “ Because the culture of any community has many facets and manifestations” pode ser substituído, sem alteração de significado ou estrutura da frase, por
Texto associado
In the excerpt “and some of these are discussed below”, the referent of the word in bold is
Leia o texto a seguir: Learning Portuguese-English cognates is a great way to build vocabulary fast! It’s basically using what you already know to get a jump-start. Cognates are simply words that are very similar in both languages, usually due to a common root. Below, you can explore some of the typical spelling patterns for English → Portuguese cognates, with examples for each one. Remember that these patterns do not apply every time. But they are a convenient way to help you notice more cognates as you continue to learn English! Observe os padrões de sufixo abaixo e complete as lacunas indicadas. ph → f Ex: telephone → telefone tion → -ção Ex: nation → nação ty → ____________ Ex: society → ____________ fy → ____________ Ex: identify → ____________ (...) Practice Portuguese. Portuguese-English Cognates. Practice Portuguese, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.practiceportuguese.com/learning-notes/portugueseenglish-cognates/. Acesso em: 12 jul. 2024. Adaptado. Em sequência, os termos que completam corretamente essas lacunas são:
Considere a habilidade: (EF08LI04PE) Utilizar recursos e repertório linguísticos apropriados para informar/comunicar/falar do futuro: planos, previsões, possibilidades e probabilidades. Em uma atividade de sala, a professora pediu aos alunos que marcassem em suas agendas seus planos para a semana seguinte. Em seguida, eles deveriam sentar-se com um colega e simular um diálogo. Para realizar a atividade, ela escreveu na lousa o seguinte diálogo, a partir do qual os alunos deveriam usar corretamente um repertório linguístico aprendido para preencher a lacuna. Aluno A: What __________ (do) on Monday/Tuesday/Wednesday…? Aluno B: I ____________ (play soccer/go dancing/do my homework…) on Monday/Tuesday/Wednesday… Para que os alunos sejam bem-sucedidos nessa atividade, é preciso que eles saibam usar corretamente qual tempo verbal?
Texto associado
De acordo com o texto, a pesquisa publicada no ‘Humanities & Social Sciences Communications’ avalia o impacto da IA
Texto associado
In the excerpt taken from TEXT, “As emerging algorithm-driven artificial intelligence (AI) continues to spread, will people be better off than they are today?”, the pronoun “they” refers to
Texto associado
Text I and answer the fourteen questions that follow it
Text I The “literacy turn” in education: reexamining what it means to be literate In response to the phenomena of mass migration and the emergence of digital communications media that defined the last decade of the 20th century, the New London Group (NLG) called for a broader view of literacy and literacy teaching in its 1996 manifesto, A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. The group argued that literacy pedagogy in education must (1) reflect the increasing cultural and linguistic diversity of the contemporary globalized world, and (2) account for the new kinds of texts and textual engagement that have emerged in the wake of new information and multimedia technologies. In order to better capture the plurality of discourses, languages, and media, they proposed the term ‘multiliteracies’. Within the NLG’s pedagogy of multiliteracies, language and other modes of communication are viewed as dynamic resources for meaning making that undergo constant changes in the dynamics of language use as learners attempt to achieve their own purposes. Within this broader view of literacy and literacy teaching, learners are no longer “users as decoders of language” but rather “designers of meaning.” Meaning is not viewed as something that resides in texts; rather, deriving meaning is considered an active and dynamic process in which learners combine and creatively apply both linguistic and other semiotic resources (e.g., visual, gesture, sound, etc.) with an awareness of “the sets of conventions connected with semiotic activity [...] in a given social space” (NLG, 1996, p. 74). Grounded within the view that learning develops in social, cultural, and material contexts as a result of collaborative interactions, NLG argued that instantiating literacy-based teaching in classrooms calls on the complex integration and interaction of four pedagogical components that are neither hierarchical nor linear and can at times overlap: situated practice, overt instruction, critical framing, and transformed practice. […] Although the NLG’s pedagogy of multiliteracies was conceived as a “statement of general principle” (1996, p. 89) for schools, the group’s call for educators to recognize the diversity and social situatedness of literacy has had a lasting impact on foreign language (FL) teaching and learning. The reception of the group’s work along with that of other scholars from critical pedagogy appeared at a time when the field was becoming less solidly anchored in theories of L2 acquisition and more interested in the social practice of FL education itself. In the section that follows, we describe the current state of FL literacy studies as it has developed in recent years, before finally turning to some very recent emerging trends that we are likely to see develop going forward. (Adapted from: https://www.colorado.edu/center/altec/sites/default/files/ attachedfiles/moving_toward_multiliteracies_in_foreign_language_teaching.pdf)